Tackling deprivation or cynical political manoeuvring
A Chara,
In May 2005, the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA)
published its latest study locating deprivation in the North of Ireland
According to the findings, no less than 70% of residents living in the 10%
most deprived neighbourhoods identified are Catholic. Furthermore, 72 of the
100 most deprived neighbourhoods in the North of Ireland are predominantly
or overwhelmingly nationalist. Indeed, 36 of the 50 most deprived
neighbourhoods are predominantly or overwhelmingly nationalist.
The import of these findings in the current political climate is to expose
the fallacy of the claims being made by unionist politicians that the
Protestant, unionist community is predominantly suffering in terms of
deprivation.
The figures reveal real deprivation in many unionist areas- particularly
North and West Belfast. However, the findings can only be interpreted as
once again confirming that nationalist districts pre-dominate the
deprivation rankings, a fact that should heavily mitigate against the
British Government launching a discriminatory investment programme as
suggested by many unionist leaders in recent days.
With this in mind, it is particularly interesting to hear that the British
Government have appointed a Minister (David Hanson) with the new brief of
exclusively liaising with unionist civic, community and political leaders in
anticipation‚ of the arrival of investment packages for loyalist
communities. This follows news that the British Government has actively
encouraged European Union funding to be directed towards the Orange Order.
Both developments would appear to give credence to the view that the British
Government are seeking to meet the DUP demand of skewing public funding
criteria away from areas of need and disproportionately towards unionist
groups and communities.
Tackling poverty and deprivation requires a genuine, comprehensive and
sustained approach by government in partnership with local communities. The
type of cynical political manoeuvring we have witnessed in recent weeks will
do little to reassure many in the community that this government is serious
about tackling deprivation wherever it exists.
Chris Donnelly,
Lisburn.
Sindo's hypocrisy
A Chara,
I am surely not the only one who has noticed the irony of the Sunday
Independent's campaign against the arrival of Associated Newspapers in the
form of an Irish edition of the Daily Mail. One accusation against the Daily
Mail: "The paper labelled Ireland's national heroes as murderers and accused
them of killing unarmed British soldiers," applies equally to Independent
Newspapers, which is supposed to be an Irish newspaper.
The Daily Mail is not being attacked because of its Anti-Irishness,
considering the Sunday Independent's patronising attitude to all forms of
Irish language, culture and nationalist politics it's an amusing idea, but
because it is a rival to that newspaper in the search for the right-wing,
conservative, anti-republican readership.
The lesson for republicans however, is simply a reminder that while our
media is composed of many voices, and with the arrival of the Daily Mail
will have one more, the consistent and sustained anti-republican message is
much the same regardless of whether it's an English Daily Mail writer or the
colonialised mindset of a Sunday Independent scribbler.