3 June 1999 Edition

Resize: A A A Print

McBrides challenge British army

By CAITLIN DOHERTY

The family of assassinated North Belfast teenager Peter McBride is challenging the British Ministry of Defence (MoD) by seeking a judicial review of the decision to allow the two British soldiers convicted of murder to remain in the army.

The British soldiers lost two appeals against their murder convictions before being freed on the word of Mo Mowlam. They immediately returned to their regiment. An Phoblacht has learned that they resumed immediate training in England in the same training centre as the RIR. They are now understood to be part of a future so-called peacekeeping force in Kosovo.

The legal challenge to an MoD decision, which is unprecedented in legal history, opened at the Belfast High Court on Tuesday. Acting on behalf of the McBride family, Micheal Lavery QC from Madden & Finucane solicitors, said in court on Tuesday that ``in England, police officers who ill-treat dogs are not seen suitable for service, whereas soldiers who murder innocent civilians are.''

The British MoD has so far argued that the Scots Guards case is a ``private matter'' between the Army Board and the soldiers and is therefore not suitable for review.

This interpretation was, however, challenged by Micheal Lavery, who urged the British army not to shy away from the fact that it is not a private matter and is therefore suitable for judicial review.

Micheal Lavery added that a number of issues were at stake, such as public confidence in the army, the rights of people. ``This is a matter of public law'', he added before concluding that the remedy was a judicial review.

The arrogance and insensitivity of the British army defence was blatant. The MoD lawyer, Ian Burnett QC, told the McBride family that they had ``no right'' to have the two soldiers thrown out of the army.

The independent assessor of military complaints, Jim MacDonald has himself recently ``seriously criticised'' the decision to allow Scots Guards James Fisher and Mark Wright remain in the British army. In his sixth annual report, MacDonald said the decision could undermine confidence in the government.

``The view expressed to me to me by a large number of people at all levels within the community was that, whereas it was acceptable that these two young men were released by the Secretary of State, it was inappropriate that they were subsequently reinstated in their regiment,'' he said.

Paul O'Connor, of the Pat Finucane Centre, who has campaigned on behalf of the McBride family, called McDonald's remarks ``highly significant''. Peter McBride's mother, Jean, said she was ``delighted'' with the statement.

``I knew from the start that they would be released, but when they were allowed back into the army it just floored me'', she said.

The two British soldiers who shot the father-of-two in the back shortly after he was stopped and searched in New Lodge were serving life sentences for the killing of the North Belfast man in September 1992 when they were released by Mo Mowlam after six years in jail.

The decision on whether to grant a judicial review to the McBrides is expected to be reserved.

An Phoblacht
44 Parnell Sq.
Dublin 1
Ireland