AGENDA: Republican initiatives around truth, recovery and healing
Photo: PHILIP McGUIGAN
Healing needed to build the peace
More than 3,500 people lost their lives as a result of the armed conflict
between 1969 and 1998. The meetings I have with victims indicate that the
wounds have been badly closed and that there is a responsibility on us all
to try to bring about healing to the thousands of people still suffering.
There have been a number of republican initiatives and statements around
truth, recovery and healing in the last number of years. The most notable of
these was the statement issued by the IRA in July 2002 apologising for the
deaths of all non-combatants and acknowledging that all sides had suffered.
In September 2003 Sinn Féin published a discussion document on the issue. In
it we called for a focused debate and political engagement with all relevant
parties around how we might deal with the past.
Recently, some sections of loyalism have started discussing the issue and we
should welcome the fact that they are at least opening up the debate within
their own constituencies.
The British state, on the other-hand, has never faced up to its
responsibilities. British military and security agencies have enjoyed total
imunity for their dirty war in our country. And ten years on from the Good
Friday Agreement they have yet to even acknowledge that they were part of
the conflict, still trying to maintain the fiction that they were caught
between two warring factions.
The facts are that in the course of the conflict, the British State, through
its armed forces, was directly responsible for killing 365 people. The
unionist paramilitaries, which they established and used to carry out most
of their killing, were responsible for the deaths of more than 1,100 during
the same period.
So, British state and state sponsored violence resulted in at least 1,500
deaths.
Republicans, like the other protagonists in the conflict need to consider
ways of dealing with the legacy of the past. When doing so however, we must
remember that:
The British State acted with impunity.
Collusion was a British strategy aimed at pacifying the republican
community.
The British lied and continue to lie about their role in these
killings.
The institutions of the state covered up their activities.
There was never any proper police or judicial investigation.
The political establishment, north and south turned a blind eye.
The media, for the most part, echoed the 'official' line.
The British have never acknowledged or apologised for their
actions.
Republicans have taken initiatives around truth and truth recovery but until
victims achieve acknowledgement and healing the past will continue to invade
the present. Should there be a truth process or a truth commission? We need
to have that debate. The following principles can be distilled from our
discussion document:
Victims have a right both to acknowledgement of their pain and to
contribute to a changing society.
Full co-operation and disclosure by all relevant parties would be
essential to the success of any process.
There can be no hierarchy of victims.
Any process should be politically neutral.
Any panel/commission would need to be independent.
Healing, for victims and for society should be the aim of any
process.
Any process should be informed by a desire to learn the lessons of
the past so that mistakes will not be repeated.
The focus of any truth process should not be restricted to
combatant groups. Other institutions would require scrutiny. This includes
the media, judiciary, state institutions, civic society etc...
Humility and generosity should inform the parties seeking to reach
agreement on this issue. It should not be about getting one over on one's
opponents.
A common aim should be to enable society to build the peace.
Articles may not be reproduced without the consent of An Phoblacht. For further information, please contact