Top Issue 1-2024

6 December 2010

Resize: A A A Print

Fintan O’Toole’s technical tangle

FINTAN O’TOOLE is an intelligent and thought-provoking commentator.
His new book, Enough Is Enough, offers 50 proposals for political and social reform. Many offer sensible and credible solutions to the failures of our current system and are remarkably similar to Sinn Féin’s current policy agenda. Others, while not to the tastes of this writer, are nonetheless valuable contributions to the ongoing debate about how to build a better Ireland.
However, his proposals for how to deal with the current political and economic crisis are completely off the wall.
Speaking on RTÉ’s The Frontline (Monday, November 22nd) and writing in the following day’s Irish Times, he argued that the Government should stand down, and be replaced by a “short-term technical administration’ to be followed by a referendum on ‘two alternative plans’ on the state’s future.
The proposals, despite Fintan’s good intentions, are illogical, contradictory and deeply undemocratic.
His ‘technical administration’ would be “led by people of integrity and competence” and although not granted any political power would negotiate on our behalf, presumably with the European Commission, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund.
These people would not be elected and would have no negotiating mandate but would be tasked with producing an agreement on the future of the economy.
By any standards the appointment of a caretaker administration is a deeply undemocratic idea.
Who would appoint them and against what criteria?
On what basis would they negotiate, with whom and to what end?
Is Fintan really suggesting that Michael Sommers of the National Treasury Management Agency and Mary Robinson should negotiate the future economic and social development of the state with the EU and IMF?
In addition to being undemocratic, the ‘technical administration’ idea also clashes with Fintan’s referendum idea.
On The Frontline he suggested that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael should draft a proposal on the future political and economic development of the state while the Labour Party and the Irish Congress of Trade Unions should draft an alternative plan and that both be put to the people in a referendum. This, he argued, would restore popular sovereignty.
Now just how a referendum on these two packages would sit with the outcome of the international negotiations conducted by the unelected ‘technical administration’ is not quite clear.
And why Labour is assumed to be sufficiently different from Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to form an opposing side in any referendum is also unclear.  After all, does Labour not support the Government’s four-year deficit reduction plan? And have they not ruled out reversing any aspect of the Government’s €6billion austerity Budget?
Lest the reader think I am being unkind, I must admit that Fintan is right about a number of things: the current Government no longer has a mandate to govern; radical social, economic and political reform are required to get us out of the mess created by Fianna Fáil and the Green Party; and, crucially, popular sovereignty must be restored.
Rather than come up with badly-thought-out schemes for saving the country, Fintan should join the call for an immediate general election, carefully read the policy positions and pre-Budget submissions of all the political parties, and publicly support the party whose positions most closely reflect his own.
The only problem is that if he took this course of action he would have no other choice than to vote for Sinn Féin. Now that would be a real sign of change!

Follow us on Facebook

An Phoblacht on Twitter

An Phoblacht Podcast

An Phoblacht podcast advert2

Uncomfortable Conversations 

uncomfortable Conversations book2

An initiative for dialogue 

for reconciliation 

— — — — — — —

Contributions from key figures in the churches, academia and wider civic society as well as senior republican figures

GUE-NGL Latest Edition ad

An Phoblacht
44 Parnell Sq.
Dublin 1
Ireland