Top Issue 1-2024

27 November 2014

Resize: A A A Print

‘Hooded Men’ – Gerry Adams's letter to Taoiseach on deadline for Europe reopening internment torture cases

● One of the 'Hooded Men': Gerard McKerr (Image: RTÉ)

‘Because of British lies, the ECHR judgement in 1978 facilitated the use of these torture techniques in other conflict situations, including Iraq and Afghanistan’

GERRY ADAMS has written to Taoiseach Enda Kenny to press him on next week’s (4 December) deadline for the Irish Government to ask the European Court of Human Rights to reopen the case of the 14 ‘Hooded Men’ tortured by the British Army and the RUC during internment in 1971.

Internment poster

The window of opportunity to have the case looked at again comes after the uncovering of new evidence that the British Government lied in an earlier case taken by the Irish Government to the ECHR on behalf of the Hooded Men.

Gerry Adams has pursued the case over several months and has asked the Taoiseach when the Irish Government will make a decision.

The Sinn Féin President’s letter reads:

❝ A Thaoisigh, a chara,

In 1971, the Irish Government took a case to Europe on behalf of ‘The Hooded Men’. These were 14 Irish citizens who were arrested by the British Army following the introduction of internment in August 1971.

Internment beatings in street

In the course of seven days they were hooded and subject to brutal in-depth interrogation techniques by the RUC Special Branch and the British Ministry of Defence’s Joint Services Interrogation Wing (JSIW).

The European Commission on Human Rights in 1977 ruled that this was torture. The British Government appealed and the following year the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the men had not suffered torture but inhuman and degrading treatment.

Taoiseach, evidence has now emerged that the British Government lied to the Irish Government, lied to the lawyers acting for the ‘Hooded Men,’ and lied to the ECHR.

Lawyers acting for ‘The Hooded Men’ wrote to the Office of the Attorney General last October. 

They provided a range of new material in respect and asked that the Irish Government “urgently review the ECHR judgement marked in the case of Ireland v the United Kingdom, Application no. 5310/71, 18th January 1978 with a view to reopening the same before the Court through their capacity as a member state under Article 33 of the Convention”.

In March, the Attorney General concluded that she could “find nothing new in the documentation” and concluded that it did not meet “the threshold which would warrant this state bringing an application to reopen the case before the ECHR”.

I expressed my disappointment and called for a reversal of the decision.

In June, a major documentary by RTÉ – The Torture Files – reported on additional new evidence which it and the Pat Finucane Centre had uncovered.

Lord Carrington

This revealed that the British Government lied to the ECHR about the use of the so-called five techniques for in-depth interrogation; lied to the ECHR on the severity of the interrogation methods employed and the detail of this torture, including its location; lied to the ECHR about the medical and psychological consequences on the 14 men tortured; and failed to inform the ECHR that this torture had been cleared at British Cabinet level by the then Foreign Secretary, Lord Carrington [pictured].

It is clear from all of the documentation now available that the use of torture against these 14 men was a matter of administrative practice by the British Government.

I immediately wrote to the Attorney General on this. In his response to me in July, the Attorney General’s Private Secretary confirmed that the “process of giving detailed and careful consideration to the material is in hand and could take some time”.

Taoiseach, there is a December 4th deadline for the reopening of this case. Time is quickly running out.

This was a landmark judgement. The 14 men were denied justice. The Irish Government lost a case it should have won. And, because of British lies, the ECHR judgement in 1978 facilitated the use of these torture techniques in other conflict situations, including Iraq and Afghanistan.

There is a grave onus on the Office of the Attorney General and the Government to conclude its deliberations and seek a reopening of this case.

When do you expect that the Government will conclude its deliberations and take its decision? ❞

➤ Watch: RTÉ Investigations Unit

The Torture Files

Spreadeagled civilians

Follow us on Facebook

An Phoblacht on Twitter

An Phoblacht Podcast

An Phoblacht podcast advert2

Uncomfortable Conversations 

uncomfortable Conversations book2

An initiative for dialogue 

for reconciliation 

— — — — — — —

Contributions from key figures in the churches, academia and wider civic society as well as senior republican figures

GUE-NGL Latest Edition ad

An Phoblacht
44 Parnell Sq.
Dublin 1
Ireland